Hiking in Shenandoah National Park – The mandarins of Imperial China – Their contempt for commerce – Their counterparts in modern U. S. – Trump’s appeal in the role of outsider – The claims of Trump vs. the sad reality – Evening statistics
The flight from election matters continued by my hiking with the Vigorous Hiking group in Shenandoah, up the Buck Ridge Trail, taking Hazel Mountain and White Rocks Trails to Sam’s Ridge, up Sam’s Ridge, and back via Hazel Mountain and Buck Hollow Trails, about 16.5 miles and an elevation gain of close to 4000 feet. Both Buck Hollow and Sam’s Ridge are among the steepest climbs in Shenandoah, although each of them is less steep than Leading Ridge. It was a beautiful autumn day, cool enough to make the long ascents pleasant, sunny and clear. There were numerous stream crossings but only one required my using water shoes. The others had several rocks that enabled us to cross the stream dry-shod. The leaves are past their peak now and many trees are denuded altogether, but there were still many areas of colorful display. Politics certainly obtruded as we chatted among ourselves, but even though our group contained persons with a varying assortment of viewpoints we could converse with civility and without animosity.
All in all the day was delightful; now I return back to sober reality. The ballots are coming in and being tallied, and as that is happening I ponder on my conversation with JN, my Democratic friend who has a shame-faced semi-admiration for Donald Trump.
Over the years we have been developing a professional class whom I privately term as “mandarins.” The label is derived from the government of Imperial China, which was run by scholars who were trained in administration as students and chosen by competitive examination. It sounds like an ideal system, in theory at any rate: no noisy, messy, costly elections, for instance. What the Chinese actually got in the way of government was far from ideal. Setting aside the corruption inherent in such a system, the officials produced in this way may have excelled at taking examinations but were ignorant of many of the concerns of the countrymen they were supposed to govern, especially the commercial ones. Indeed, the merchants occupied the lowest class in China, subservient to scholars, farmers, and artisans, in that order. The scholars were positively encouraged to look down upon them. Contact with nations whose merchants had greater latitude did not alter their views. A fragment of a conversation between the Emperor and one of his advisers concerning the Western nations with whom they traded has survived:
EMPEROR – It is plain that these barbarians always look on trade as their chief occupation and are wanting in any high purpose or striving for territorial acquisition.
ADVISER: At bottom they belong to the class of brutes. It is impossible that they should have any high purpose.
Modernize the style of this exchange, and it could be duplicated on any American campus.
This characteristic disdain for mercantile activity, incidentally, was to have dire consequences in the early 19th century. Unable to produce a reliable coinage – there was no standard in quality, the value fluctuated wildly, and the coins or bullion were heavy to carry around – the government left their merchants to devise a more effective substitute currency, and eventually one was found: opium. It became the only commodity for which merchants or indeed the general public were ready to offer cash or barter in steady rates. It was also safer; the coinage betrayed itself by its weight, and the owner ran a risk of being robbed or murdered by boatmen whenever he carried any. The result was that opium made the rounds throughout the entire country and gave rise to the drug addiction that decimated the Chinese populace and made the nation vulnerable to foreign invasion, which was not slow in coming. And it may well be that our own current opioid crisis is, similarly, a symptom of deep-rooted weaknesses in our system, which contact with the pandemic is beginning to expose.
In recent years our politicians have been largely recruited from a similar system: a production of men and women who are literate, without being competent technocrats or scientists or businessmen, greatly out of proportion to the abilities of the national economic system to employ them. These academics are widely regarded by many of their countrymen as being out of touch with their basic concerns and ignorant of the economic factors that shape most of their lives. Biden himself serves as an example. His experience of life outside politics is minimal. He served as a city councilman at the age of 27, became Delaware’s junior senator at the age of 30, and his entire career (outside of a few years after college when he was a lawyer) has been occupied by political office. One of the reasons that Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez enjoys so much popularity among her adherents is that she has undertaken working-class occupations in her early years, including those of bartender, waitress, house cleaner, and bus driver. The overwhelming majority of her colleagues on either party would be hopelessly at a loss if directed to perform any of these.
Into this state of affairs comes Donald Trump, proudly boasting of himself as an outsider to such a system, a man who had devoted most of his life not to politics to business matters, such as running a company and erecting numerous businesses as a source of employment. That is the main source of his appeal to many voters, particularly those in the working-class. He is not a lawyer or a social worker or a professor or a member of a profession that is funded solely through taxation; he is “one of us.”
The problem, of course, is that Trump is quite a poor representative of the class of man he claims to embody – a corporate president, to be sure, but one who has declared bankruptcy on no less than six separate occasions; a man who has created businesses to employ people, but businesses that fail to provide anything useful and which eventually fall into desuetude. In Atlantic City alone, he is responsible for: 1) the Trump Taj Mahal, which shut down after a bare 26 years of operation upon its failure to reach a deal with its union workers, causing 3,000 people to lose their jobs; 2) the Trump Plaza Hotel and Casino, which closed permanently in 2014, putting 1,300 people out of work, and now slated for demolition; 3) the Trump Marina, which languished under his administration until it was bought by Landry’s in 2011 at about one-tenth of Trump’s initial asking price; 4) Trump’s World Fair, which Trump purchased in 1989, saw it transferred back to the mortgage owner in 1992, re-purchased in 1995, and had it permanently closed in 1999, after which it was torn down for demolition a year later.
But whatever else may be said of Trump, he is artful in concealing his numerous failures. His extravagantly gilded lifestyle may indeed be motivated, at least in part, by such a concern. At any rate, he has managed to persuade untold numbers of men and women to be dependent on him to an extent – quite an astonishing one, considering his proven record of failure as a husband, a business associate, an employer, a creditor, or a friend.
So there we stand at the crossroads. Who shall prevail, the mandarin or the charlatan? In a few hours the fate of the nation for the next four years will be decided.
The COVID virus, of course, functions quite independently of any election. Today’s statistics as of 8:00 PM – # of cases worldwide 47,837,477; # of deaths worldwide: 1,219,704; # of cases U.S.: 9,691,088; # of deaths; U.S.: 238,637. Of today’s increases, we account for 19.4% of the new cases globally and 14.6% of the new deaths. Our rate of infection is now approaching 3% of the population. Of the nations with a population of over 10,000,000, only Belgium and Czechia exceed us in case incidence rate. We are ninth on the list of nations with the highest mortality rates, but two of the nations that exceed ours (San Marino and Andorra) are micro-states.